Let me be clear that I'm not a specialist in this area. I gather information through publications, papers and journals.
The seed of Western men became weak. The population is decreasing, getting old, losing male infertility. Scary!
We need to think how we arrived to this point.
Let's look at a few possible causes.
Pollution
Since natural gas is colorless and odorless, we add a "harmless, non-toxic chemical" that makes it easier to detect a gas leak before it can create a hazardous situation. The chemical, called Mercaptan, smells a lot like rotten eggs. The nose can detect Mercaptan at a 1.6 p.p.b. (parts per billion). The typical range of odorants in natural gas ranges from 0.1-10 p.p.m. (parts per million)If we could smell any harmful pollutants in our environment, food and water, what would it be like?
Air Pollution by industry, via combustibles from cars, airplanes. Pollution via products like plastics, can food, toys.
Pesticides and chemicals used by farmers. Poison in food chain and water but also fluoride in water.
Atmospheric manipulations via chemtrails. Chemicals and medications used on animals to produce meat.
Drugs, vaccination and alcohol, narcotics, tobacco but also medication and medical treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy an X-Ray. Radiation from cell phones, electricity distribution, send/receive towers for networks.
Radiation from nuclear bomb testing. Every nuclear bomb explosion in history 1945-2015
A large number of studies and papers are showing that the effects of nuclear testing are very harmful for the life on our planet.
Increase in the use of Mercury in electronics such as energy saving lamps. The increase of Cadmium like in Ni-Cd batteries, electroplating process, nuclear fission process, bearing alloys and oil paint etc..
For sure this list is not complete but (scary) enough.
Most of the pollution causes DNA damage. Some a little and others very strong like Cadmium. The increased risk of sperm DNA damage is the most important factor in male infertility.
Some metals, like Aluminum, Arsenic, Lead, Lithium, Manganese, Mercury and Thallium, are toxic to the central nervous system and brain. It changes us to zombies.
Cobalt becomes more and more important for clean energy like the use of Cobalt in electric cars and rechargeable batteries. A complete report on toxicity of Cobalt is not available but there are some publications showing clear toxic effects in human but urges for more research.
Fluoride, used in water and toothpaste, is a highly toxic substance. Fluoride is more toxic than Lead, but less than Arsenic. Fluoride has been used in pesticides to kill pests like rats and insects.Fluoride is a neurotoxin and causes significant brain damage and a low IQ. It is associated to ADHD and other mental diseases. It affects the pineal gland, the thyroid, the kidneys, it weakens bones.
It causes cardiovascular inflammation and Atherosclerosis; heart disease and strokes are responsible for almost 50% of mortality(!).
Fluoride correspond to lower fertility rates in both men and women and cause early puberty in girls.
The major risks for Fluoride intake are high doses and duration of ingestion. Water we drink all our live, maybe the last time on our dying bed. The content of natural fluoride in water ranges from 0.01 to 7.20 mg/L.
But it's everywere free available in toothpaste, tablets, chewing gum and drops without any prescription or control.
Further, Fluoride accumulates, like a lot of chemicals and metals do, in our food and water chains and we, and animals, store it in our bones.
The U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare declares in 1975 that there was no issue on human health whatsoever concerning the accumulation of Fluoride in our food chain so, it's safe?Pesticides are one of the main sources of Fluoride in our food chain. Pesticides are widely used in the production of cereals, legumes and oilseeds. Leafy vegetables showed higher accumulation like spinach, ranging from 3.62 to 12.88 mg/kg and in coriander from 9.66 to 25.73 mg/kg. This is a lot more than what is considered as normal.
Knowing all this you may ask yourself: why we still use so much Fluoride in production and water? Why we don't remove it from the water? Removal is possible and is expensive; we better stop adding Fluoride to the water. Fluoride has proven its health benefits for our teeth, but not by intake, on the contrary, but by locally treating on our teeth.
Chemtrails.
Geoengineering is not a conspiracy theory. Geoengineering proposals were first developed during World War II. One of the best-known techniques is Cloud Seeding, a process that attempts to make it rain by dispersing Silver-iodide or solid Carbon-Dioxide into clouds. Cloud Seeding has also been used in attempts to manipulate tropical storms (!?) for whatever reason.To have an idea; only in the US an amount of 110 million tons of solid Carbon-Dioxide (=60,036,383,548 m3 in gas) is spread via chemtrails, every year, to manipulate weather.
110 Million tons of Carbon-Dioxide is enough to bring the concentration at 400 ppm in 150,090,958,870,000 m3 clean air.
Less innocent examples of chemtrails, to don't say scary and dangerous, are the use of Barium, nano Aluminum-coated fiberglass, radioactive Thorium, Cadmium, Chromium, Nickel, Ethylene-Dibromide, and polymer fibers. It is remarkable that the chemtrails occur mainly in Western countries as the map shows. One source will say that it's all for a good reason; to lower the greenhouse gas concentration and to study climate. Other sources say that it's a deliberate attack on human health. Another consideration is that many substances used are never, or too little, examined for the chronic health effects and the harmful effects in nature or agriculture. Whatever it might be, the dispersion of metals and chemicals in the air can't be good for any living creature and will end-up in our food and water chain.And, of course, there is Weather Warfare. During the Vietnam war the U.S. Air Force flies more than 2,600 cloud-seeding sorties as part of a covert effort to extend the monsoon season and inhibit North Vietnamese troop movements. Dubbed Operation Popeye, the program is the first known instance of hostile weather manipulation in military history.
During the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques in 1977, the U.N. General Assembly approves the Environmental Modification Convention, which bans weather warfare and other hostile uses of climate manipulation "having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects." The treaty covers the use of environmental warfare techniques and not the ban of research and development of such weapons and is eventually ratified by 76 countries.
But why we don't take action? O yes we do, but in a lot of cases the damage in 1, 2 or more generations is already done before we take action because a lack of knowledge and research. Take an example of Benzene. Benzene is an aromatic hydrocarbon that, with sufficient cumulative lifetime doses, can cause acute Myelogenous Leukemia. Typical Benzene air concentrations, considering both personal and area samples of various durations, were as high as 200 p.p.m. in the 1930s through the 1950s,
3–35 p.p.m. in the 1960s,
1.3–16 p.p.m. in the 1970s,
0.013–1 p.p.m. in the 1980s,
and far less than 1 p.p.m. in the 1990s and 2000s.
Actual TLV is lower than 50 p.p.b.
But just to get an idea how close we are with Benzene; gasoline contains to an average of 0.62% to 1.3% Benzene. Our drinking water might contain up to 5 p.p.b. Benzene. These are 'normal' values.
Very actual in the last couple of years is the use of new types of pesticides. Neonicotinoids are highly persistent chemicals, lasting (according to the few studies published so far) for up to 19 years in the soil. Because they are persistent, they are likely to accumulate: with every year of application the soil will become more toxic. What these pesticides do once they are in the soil, no one knows, as sufficient research has not been conducted.
Neonicotinoid chemicals are a controversial subject and is used already for more than 20 years as an insecticide. The European Food Safety Authority, EFSA, linked in January 2013 imidacloprid to declines in bee health.
The EFSA recommends, based on a Scientific Research done in Japan, that all neonicotinoids should now be assessed for their potential developmental neurotoxicity.
Official is stated that: The neonicotinoid family includes acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. Imidacloprid is the most widely used insecticide in the world. Compared to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides, neonicotinoids cause less toxicity in birds and mammals than insects.
A research Published in April 8, 2009 concluded that Imidacloprid generally demonstrates low human lethality even in large ingestions. Respiratory failure and reduced level of consciousness were the most serious complications, but these were uncommon. Substitution of imidacloprid for organophosphorus compounds in areas where the incidence of self-poisoning is high may help reduce deaths from self-poisoning.
So is it safe?
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acknowledges the proven dangers of Bee-Killing Neonicotinoid pesticides in January 2017, but refuses to restrict them for one or another reason.
A report issued by the European Food Safety Commission (EFSA) in December 2014 has found that a class of crop pesticides previously linked to causing mass bee deaths is also inherently harmful to humans. Researchers from the EFSA determined that neonicotinoid pesticides -- acetamiprid and imidacloprid in particular -- obstruct the normal development and function of the human nervous system, as well as damage brain structures and functions associated with learning and memory. The report, cites evidence demonstrating the neurotoxicity of neonicotinoids in humans, which has gone mostly unstudied.
Professor Dave Goulson published in the Journal of Applied Ecology in 2013 "an overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides" and he stated "Although vertebrates are less susceptible than arthropods, consumption of small numbers of dressed seeds offers a route to direct mortality in birds and mammals... Major knowledge gaps remain, but current use of neonicotinoids is likely to be impacting on a broad range of non-target taxa including pollinators and soil and aquatic invertebrates and hence threatens a range of ecosystem services." In March 2015 at Plymouth University UK, Professor Dave Goulson gave a lecture that was entitled "Bees, Pesticides and Politics" that struck politics and public opinion like lightning.
Some Neonicotinoids have already been banned by the European Union in 2013, following analysis – since confirmed by the pesticide industry’s own research – that they posed a grave risk to bee populations. The research emerged as the EU’s general court began hearing a case by Syngenta and Bayer to overturn the pesticides ban. The Guardian UK stated in 2013 that as the manufacturers did for DDT, the corporations which make these toxins claimed that they were harmless to species other than the pests they targeted. Just as they did for DDT, they have threatened people who have raised concerns, published misleading claims and done all they can to bamboozle the public.
Let's say that the difference between the truth and common sense is in the hands of lawyers. If there is a conflict of interest or whatever it might be; we saw in the past 100 years up to today lawsuits in the tobacco industry and really nothing changed.
Another case in the hands of lawyers is the use of Glyphosate.
N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine is a broad-spectrum systemic herbicide and crop desiccant.
By 2016 there was a 100-fold increase from the late 1970s in the frequency of applications and volumes of Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) applied, with further increases expected in the future, partly in response to the global emergence and spread of Glyphosate-resistant weeds. The development of Glyphosate resistance in weed species is emerging as a costly problem. An increasing number of crops have been genetically engineered to be tolerant of Glyphosate.
Glyphosate (Roundup), brought in the market in 1974 by Monsanto, became a 'tug of war rope' between politics, lawyers, scientists and the public opionion. In 2015, the World Health Organization, through the International Agency for Research on Cancer, classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. In March 2015 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic in humans" (category 2A) based on epidemiological studies, animal studies, and in vitro studies. In November, 2015, the European Food Safety Authority published an updated assessment report on glyphosate, concluding that "the substance is unlikely to be genotoxic (i.e. damaging to DNA) or to pose a carcinogenic threat to humans."
In 2016, Monsanto filed a lawsuit objecting to glyphosate being added to California's list of carcinogens. In January 2017, the Fresno County Superior Court rejected the case. The state of California filed a motion to dismiss the case.
In March 2017, 40 plaintiffs filed a lawsuit at the Alameda County Superior Court, a branch of the
In March 2017 'GLOBAL 2000' published a report "How industry strategized (and regulators colluded) in an attempt to save the world’s most widely used herbicide from a ban" written By Helmut Burtscher-Schaden PhD, Peter Clausing PhD, and Claire Robinson MPhil, which leaves no doubt about the efforts made by the industry to influence research and studies.
The Monsanto company has a wide experience with lawsuits against their products. The case 'Roundup' is just one more in a long list. Who is right or wrong is not depending only on the truth, but on the ticking clock while humans and nature are the living exposed subjects for future research.
Chemicals at home and 'toxic body burden'
The average household contains about 62 toxic chemicals. Small amounts these toxic chemicals aren’t likely to be a problem, but when we are exposed to them routinely and possible in combinations with other products, it is impossible to accurately gauge the risks.The CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, presents data for 212 chemicals.
Chronic exposure, over a lifetime, of chemicals adds to the body’s 'toxic burden' - the number of chemicals stored in its tissues at a given time - meaning that some chemicals build up enough or cause enough harm in your body over time.
The concept of body burden is that pollution is not just in our air, food and in our water - it is stored in our bodies. Some examples of chemicals we use at home:
Phthalates are known endocrine disruptors. Men with higher phthalate compounds in their blood had correspondingly reduced sperm counts, according to a 2003 study conducted by researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Harvard School of Public Health. Although exposure to phthalates mainly occurs through inhalation, it can also happen through skin contact with scented soaps, which is a significant problem. Unlike the digestive system, the skin has no safeguards against toxins. Absorbed chemicals go straight to organs. Phthalates are used in fragranced household products, such as air fresheners, dish soap, even toilet paper. Because of proprietary laws, companies don’t have to disclose what’s in their scents, so you won’t find phthalates on a label. If you see the word “fragrance” on a label, there’s a good chance phthalates are present.
Both Bisphenol A(BPA) and Phthalates are endocrine disrupters, products that mimic natural hormones and can affect reproductive development and health. BPA is linked to early puberty in girls like phthalates are. BPA and phthalates are additives in plastics; BPA creates a rigid plastic and phthalates make plastic more flexible.
Even though major manufacturers are no longer making baby bottles and children's drinking cups with BPA, it can still be found in the lining of food and beverage cans, in bottled formula, and even on shopping receipts. And even though three types of phthalates have been banned in toys for young children, they are still used to soften vinyl plastics (raincoats, backpacks, shower curtains, blow-up toys) and preserve scents (soaps, lotions, and perfumes).Perchloroethylene or 'PERC' is a neurotoxin. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, classifies perc as a possible carcinogen (a substance capable of causing cancer in living tissue) as well. People who live in residential buildings where dry cleaners are located have reported
Perchloroethylene is used in dry-cleaning solutions, spot removers, and carpet and upholstery cleaners.
Triclosan is an aggressive antibacterial agent that can promote the growth of drug-resistant bacteria. The American Medical Association has found no evidence that these antimicrobials make us healthier or safer, and they’re particularly concerned because they don’t want us overusing antibacterial chemicals — that’s how microbes develop
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, or 'QUATS' are used in fabric softener liquids and sheets, most household cleaners labeled “antibacterial.”
2-Butoxyethanol is the key ingredient in many window and multipurpose cleaners and gives them their characteristic
Because Ammonia evaporates and doesn’t leave streaks, it’s another common ingredient in commercial window cleaners, polishing agents for bathroom fixtures, sinks and jewelry. That sparkle has a price. Ammonia is a powerful
Chlorine is used in scouring powders, toilet bowl cleaners, mildew removers, laundry whiteners, household tap water. As mentioned it create a poisonous gas if it is mixed with Ammonia. You’re getting exposed through fumes and possibly through skin when you clean with it, but because it’s also in city water to get rid of bacteria, you’re also getting exposed when you take a shower or bath. The health risks from chlorine can be acute, and they can be chronic; it’s a respiratory irritant at an acute level. But the chronic effects are what people don’t realize: It may be a serious thyroid disrupter. The thyroid gland is a butterfly-shaped organ
Ethylene-Glycol is used in your car as antifreeze. It has a moderate toxicity level, however, the sweet taste can make one easily surpass that boundary, leading the ethylene glycol
Keep Ethylene glycol away from animals and pets, as they are likely to lap up the liquid as a food source. If you do ingest a large amount of Ethylene glycol, death is slow, knocking out organ systems systematically over the course of 72 hours.
Oxalic Acid has a lethal oral dose is 15 to 30 grams. The toxicity of oxalic acid is due to kidney failure caused by precipitation of solid calcium oxalate, the main component of kidney stones.
Oxalic acid, is an organic acid found in many plants. The body is known to absorb oxalic acid from only a handful of foods, according to the University of British Columbia, including peanuts, pecans, wheat bran, spinach, rhubarb, beets and beet greens and chocolate.
Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen (it has been linked to nasal squamous cell cancer) and a skin irritant that can cause allergy-like reactions including watery, burning eyes and throats, stuffy noses, and skin rashes. Allergic skin
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) is a flame retardant and is particularly worrisome. Exposure to even small doses at critical points in development can damage reproductive systems and affect motor skills, learning, memory, and hearing. Flame retardants are nearly ubiquitous in upholstered furniture, including couches, pillows,
A résumé of the facts of the case
Household chemicals, agricultural chemicals, industrial chemicals, pharmaceutical chemicals, manipulating chemicals, hazardous and harmful radiation, air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution and contamination inherited from the past.It is an endless list of dangerous and harmful substances that come into nature and threaten life on earth. A lot of effects we don't understand or even don't know yet. To understand all this, you have to be an excellent professor in chemistry, medicine, physics and biology, all together at least!
No human can gather so much knowledge in his life to understand the total picture. What does this mean?
We are under attack!
Reference List (some)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090118200636.htmhttps://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/.premium-1.614541
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2017/july/sperm-decline-fertility
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/4283806/New-evidence-that-river-pollution-could-be-causing-male-fertility-problems.html
http://www.drsoram.com/pm10/
http://www.ojs.ukw.edu.pl/index.php/johs/article/view/4324
http://www.cadmium.org/cadmium-applications
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572025
https://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/metals/8G.pdf
https://www.livescience.com/37044-cadmium.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoride_toxicity
http://nutritiondata.self.com/foods-000146000000000000000-1.html
https://www.positivehealthwellness.com/pain-relief/complete-guide-removing-fluoride-water/
https://www.globalhealingcenter.com/natural-health/9-shocking-dangers-of-fluoride/
https://www.dentalwatch.org/usphs/fl-74.pdf
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022113900841196
http://www.jieas.com/volumes/vol131-3/abs13-v8-i3-17.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293392
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474439/
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/fulltext.pdf
https://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing/general-overview-of-theeffects-of-nuclear-testing/
http://web.archive.org/web/20070914081350/http:/www.state.gov/t/ac/trt/4783.htm
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/04/29/geoengineering-chemtrails-what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying-and-why/
https://www.globalresearch.ca/chemtrails-the-consequences-of-toxic-metals-and-chemical-aerosols-on-human-health/19047
https://www.britannica.com/science/geoengineering
https://climateviewer.com/2013/10/06/geoengineering-programs-weather-modification-experiments/
https://www.stateofglobe.com/2017/10/10/yes-the-us-government-has-experimented-with-controlling-hurricanes/
https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/total-population-outlook-from-unstat-3/assessment-1
https://www.naturalnews.com/025736_health_medicines_babies.html
http://www.parents.com/health/injuries/safety/harmful-chemicals-to-avoid/
https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/ehp515/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090536X13000427
https://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/environmental-policy/dangers-neonicotinoid-pesticides-zm0z14fmzsto
https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=goulson-2013-jae.pdf&site=411
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005127
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2013/12/controversial-pesticides-linked-to-human-neurotoxicity.html
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032432
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2013/aug/05/neonicotinoids-ddt-pesticides-nature
http://www.anh-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ANHUSA-glyphosate-breakfast-study-FINAL.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_legal_cases
https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.fooddemocracynow.org/images/FDN_Glyphosate_FoodTesting_Report_p2016.pdf
https://www.global2000.at/sites/global/files/Glyphosate_and_cancer_Buying_science_EN_0.pdf
http://www.pan-europe.info/press-releases/2017/03/new-report-shows-glyphosate-producers-are-%E2%80%9Cbuying-science%E2%80%9D
https://www.global2000.at/sites/global/files/Glyphosate_and_cancer_Buying_science_EN_0.pdf
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/15/eu-report-on-weedkiller-safety-copied-text-from-monsanto-study
https://act.wemove.eu/campaigns/eci-glyphosate-int
No comments:
Post a Comment